Ch 24. The Age of
Nationalism
1850-1914
Napoleon III in France
·
Early nationalism was generally liberal and
idealistic and often democratic and radical as well
·
In 19th c, ideas of nationhood and
popular sovereignty posed a revolutionary threat to conservatives like
Metternich
·
Yet from the vantage point of the 21st
c, it is clear that nationalism wears many masks
o May
be narrowly liberal or democratic and radical
o Can
also flourish in dictatorial states, which may be conservative, fascist, or
communist, and which many impose social and economic changes from above
·
NAP’s France had already combined national
feeling with authoritarian rule
·
Significantly, it was NAP’s nephew, Louis NAP who revived and extended this
merger
France’s Second Republic
·
Louis NAP played no role in French politics
before 1848, but universal male suffrage and widespread popular support gave
him three times as many votes as the four other candidates combined in French
election of Dec 1848
·
Why did Louis NAP win by a landslide
o Louis
Nap had the great name of his uncle; romantics made NAP a demigod
o As
Karl Marx stressed, middle class and peasant property owners feared the socialist
challenge of urban workers, and they wanted a tough ruler to provide protection
o Late
in 1848, Louis NAP had a positive “program” for France, which had been
elaborated in widely circulated pamphlets before the election and which guided
him through his reign
·
Above all, Louis Nap believed that the gov
should represent the ppl and that it should try hard to help them economically
o NOT
Through PLMTs and political parties
§
French politicians represented special interest
groups, particularly the middle class
o The
answer was a strong, even authoritarian, national leader, like NAP who would
serve all the people, rich and poor
o This
leader would be linked to each citizen by direct democracy, his sovereignty
uncorrupted by politicians and legislative bodies
§
These political ideas meshed well with Louis
NAP’s vision of national unity and social progress
o The
states and its leader had a sacred duty to provide jobs and stimulate the
economy, which would benefit all classes
·
Louis NAP’s political and social ideas were at
least vaguely understood by large numbers of French peasants and workers in Dec
1848
·
To the many common ppl who voted for him, he
appeared to be a strong man and a forward looking champion of their interests
·
Elected to a four year term by an overwhelming
majority, Pres. Louis NAP had to share power with a conservative National
Assembly, according to the constitution
o With
some misgivings, he signed a bill to increase greatly the role of the Catholic
Church in primary and secondary education, and approved a law depriving many
poor ppl the right to vote – in
accordance with conservative means?
·
Took these conservatives measures for two
reasons
o Wanted
Assembly to vote funds to pay his personal debts
o Wanted
to change the constitution so he could run for a 2nd term
·
But in 1851, after the Assembly failed to
cooperate, Louis NAP began to conspire with key army officers
o December
2, 1851, he illegally dismissed the Assembly and seized power in a coup d’état
o There
was some armed resistance in Paris and widespread insurrection in countryside
in s. France, but these protests were crushed by the army
·
Restoring universal male suffrage and claiming
to stand above the bickering and divisive political, Louis HNAP called on the
French ppl, as NAP had done, to legalize his actions
·
They did: 92% voted to make him Pres. For 10 yrs
·
A Year later 97% in a plebiscite made him
hereditary emperor
Napoleon III’s Second Empire
·
Louis NAP, who was proclaimed Emperor NAP III,
experienced both success and failure between 1852-1870
·
His greatest success was with the economy, particularly
in the 1850s
o His
gov encouraged the new investment banks and massive RR construction that were
at the heart of the IR on the continent
o Gov
fostered general economic expansion through an ambitious program of public
works, which included rebuilding Paris to improve the urban environment
o The
profits of business soared with prosperity, the wages of workers more than kept
up with inflation, and unemployment declined greatly
·
Louis NAP always hoped that economic progress
would reduce social and political tensions
o This
hope was partially realized
o Until
mid 1860s there was considerable support from France’s most dissatisfied group,
the urban workers
o NAP
III’s regulation of pawnshops and his support of credit unions and better housing
for the working classes were 3evidence of helpful reform and positive concern
in the 1850s
o In
the 1860s, eh granted workers the right to from unions and strike – important
economic rights denied by earlier govs
·
At first, political power remained in the hands
of the emperor
o He
alone chose ministers, and they had great freedom of action
o At
the same time, NAP III restricted but did not abolish the Assembly
o Members
were elected by universal male suffrage every six years, and Louis NAP and his
gov took parliamentary elections very seriously
o Tried
to entice notable ppl, even those who had opposed the regime, to stand as gov
candidates in order to expand the base of support
o Moreover,
the gov used its officials and appointed mayors to spread the word that the
election of the gov’s candidates, and the defeat of the opposition, was the key
to roads, tax rebates, and thousands of other local concerns
·
In 1857 and again in 1863, Louis NAP’s system
worked brilliantly and produced overwhelming electoral victories
·
In 1860s, NAP III’s electoral system gradually
disintegrated
·
A sincere nationalist, NAP had wanted to
reorganize ERP on the principle of nationality and gain influence and territory
for France and himself
·
Instead, problems in Italy and the rising power
of Prussia led to increasing criticism at home from his Catholic and
nationalist supporters
·
With increasing effectiveness, the middle class
liberal who had always wanted a less authoritarian regime continued to denounce
his rule
·
NAP III was always sensitive to the public mood
o Public
opinion always wins the last victory
o In
1860, he responded to critics by progressively liberalizing his empire
o Gave
the Assembly greater powers and the opposition candidates greater freedom,
which they used to good advantage
o In
1869, the opposition, consisting of republicans, monarchists, and liberals,
polled almost 45% of the vote
·
The next year, a sick and weary Louis NAP again
granted France to a new constitution, which combined a basically parliamentary
regime with a hereditary emperor as chief of states
·
In a final great plebiscite on the eve of
disastrous war with Prussia, 7.5 mill French men voted in favor of the new
constitution, and only 1.5 million opposed it
·
NAP III’s attempt to reconcile a strong national
state with universal male suffrage was still evolving and was doing so in a
democratic direction
Nation Building in Italy and Germany
·
Louis NAP’s triumph in 1848 and his
authoritarian rule in the1850s provided the old ruling classes of ERP w/ a new
model in politics
·
How would urban middle classes and working
classes rally to a strong conservative national state that promoted change?
Italy to 1850
·
Italy had never been united prior to 1850
o Divided
up in Middle Ages into city states
o Battleground
for great powers after 1494
o Reorganized
in 1815 at congress of Vienna
o Lombardy
and Venetia taken by Metternich
o Sardinia
and Piedmont: Italian monarch
o Tuscany
and n-c Italy ruled
o Central
Italy and Rome: papacy, an indep political existence necessary to fulfill its
spiritual mission
o Naples
and Sicily: Branch of the Bourbons
·
Italy was a “geographical expression”
·
1815-1848: goal of unified Italian nation
captured imaginations of many Italians
·
Three approaches
o Giuseppe Mazzini: centralized democratic
republic based on universal male suffrage and the will of the ppl
o Vinzo Gioberti: Catholic priest who
called for a federation of states under presidency of progressive pope
o Those
who looked to leadership to autocratic kingdom of Sardinia-Piedmont
§
Strengthened by failures of 1848, when Austria
smashed Mazzini’s republicanism
·
Sardinia’s new monarch: Victor Emmanuel retained the liberal constitution granted by his
father in 1848
o Combined
a strong monarchy with a fair degree of civil liberties and parliamentary gov,
with deputies elected by a limited franchise based on income
o To
some of the midd classes, Sardinia appeared to be a liberal, progressive state
ideally suited to drive Austria out of n. Italy and lead a free Italy of indep
states
o Mazzini’s
democratic republic seemed quixotic and too radical
·
As for papacy, initial cautious support for
unification by Pius IX had given way
to fear and hostility after he was temporarily driven from Rome during the
upheavals of 1848
o Papacy
would stand resolutely opposed to national unification but also to most modern
trends
o 1864:
Syllabus of Errors, Pius IX denounced
rationalism, socialism, separation of church and state, and religious liberty,
denying that the “Roman pontiff can and ought to reconcile and align himself
with progress, liberalism, and modern civilization”
Cavour and Garibaldi in Italy
·
Sardinia was led by brilliant statesman: Cavour
o Dominant
figure in Sardinian gov from 1850-1861
o Came
from a noble fam, made a fortune before politics
o His
national goals were limited and realistic
o Until
1859, he sought unity only for the states of northern and perhaps central Italy
in a greatly expanded kingdom of Sardinia
·
1850s: Cavour worked to consolidate Sardinia as
a liberal constitutional state capable for leading n Italy
o Program
of highways and railroads, civil liberties and opposition to clerical privilege,
increased support for Sardinia throughout n. Italy
o Realized
he could not drive Austria out of n. Italy w/o help of a powerful ally
o Worked
for a secret diplomatic alliance with NAPIII
·
June 1858: Cavour goaded Austria into attacking
Sardinia in 1859
o NAPIII
came to Sardinia’s defense
·
After victory, NAP III, worried about criticism
from French Caths for supporting the declared enemy, abandoned Cavour
o Made
a compromise peace with Austria in July 1859
·
Sardinia received only Lombardy, rest of map
remained virtually unchanged
·
Cavour resigned in a rage
·
Cavour’s plans were salvaged by the maneuvers of
his allies in the moderate nationalist movement
o Pro-Sardinian
nationalists in Tuscany and other small states of c Italy fanned popular
revolts and toppled their ruling princes
o Using and controlling the popular enthusiasm,
the middle class nationalist leaders in c Italy called for fusion with Sardinia
o This
was not what France and other Great Powers wanted, but the nationalists held firm
·
Cavour returned to power in 1860 and gained
NAPIII’s support by ceding Savoy and Nice to France
·
PPl of c Italy then voted to join a greatly
enlarged kingdom of Sardinia under Victor Emmanuel
·
Cavour achieved his original goal of a northern Italian
state
·
For superpatriots such as Garibaldi, unification was only half done
o Romantic,
revolutionary nationalism and republicanism of Mazzini
o Emerged
as an indep force in Italian politics
·
Partly to use him, partly to rid of him, Cavour
secretly supported Garibaldi’s bold plan to “liberate” the kingdom of the Two
Sicilies
o May
1860, landed on shores of Siciliy, Garibaldi’s guerrilla band of 1,000 Red Shirts
captured the imagination of the Sicilian peasantry, which rose in bloody
rebellion against their landlords
o Outwitting
the royal army, Garibaldi won battles, gained volunteers, and took Palermo
o Crossed
to the mainland, marched toward Naples, and prepared to attack Rome
·
Cavour sent Sardinian forces to occupy Papal
states (not Rome) to intercept Garibaldi
o Realized
that an attack on Rome would bring a war on France
o Feared
Garibaldi’s radicalism and popular appeal
o Organized
a plebiscite in the conquered territories
o Garibaldi
did not oppose Cavour
o The
ppl of the south voted to join the kingdom of Sardinia
o Sealed
union of north and south, of monarch and nation state
·
Cavour succeeded
o Controlled Garibaldi and turned popular
nationalism in a conservative direction
·
New kingdom of Italy was a parliamentary
monarchy under Victory Emmanuel, neither radical nor democratic
·
Politically unified, but only some had the right
to vote
·
Propertied classes and common ppl remained
divided
·
A great and growing social and cultural gap
separated progressive, industrializing north from stagnant, agrarian south
·
New Italy was united on paper, but profound
divisions remained
The Growing Austro-Prussian Rivalry
·
In aftermath of 1848, German states were locked
in political stalemate
·
After Austria and Russia blocked FredWill’s
attempt to unify Germany, tension grew between Austria and Prussia as each power
sought to block the other within the German confederation
·
Powerful economic forces contributed to
Austro-Prussian Rivalry
o Austria
was not included in German customs union, Zollverein
o By
1853, Austria was the only state in the German Confederation that had not
joined
o Middle
class and business groups in the Zollverein were finding solid economic reasons
to bolster their idealistic support of national unification
o Prussia’s
leading role within the Zollverein gave it a valuable advantage in its struggle
against Austria’s supremacy in German political affairs
·
Prussia emerged from upheavals of 1848 with a
PLMT of sorts, which was in hands of wealthy liberal middle class by 1859
o Middle
class reps wanted to establish once and for all the PLMT, not the king, had
ultimate political power and that the army was responsible to Prussia’s elected
reps
·
National uprising in 1859 of Italy caused William I to be convinced that great
political change and war (with Austria or France) would be possible
·
William I and his top military advisors pushed
to raise taxes and increase the defense budget in order to double the size of
the army
·
The Prussian PLMT reflecting the middle class’s
desire for a less militaristic society, rejected the military budget in 1862
and the liberals triumphed completely in new elections
·
King William I called on Otto von Bismarck to head a new ministry and defy the PLTM
Bismarck and the Austro-Prussian War
·
Bismarck is the most important figure in German
history from Martin Luther to Hitler
·
Hero and villain, Bismarck was a master of
politics
·
Born into Prussian landowning aristocracy
·
Strong personality and desire for power
·
Flexible and pragmatic
·
Kept options open
·
Moved with skill and cunning toward his goal
·
First honed his political skills as a high
ranking diplomat for Prussian gov
·
Took office as chief minister, made a strong
impression
o Speeches
were a sensation and scandal
o Declared
that gov’t would rule without PLMT’s consent
o Lashed
out at middle class opposition
·
Denounced for his view that “might makes right”,
Bismarck had the Prussian bureaucracy go on collecting taxes, thought PLMT
refused to approve the budget
·
Reorganized army with continued opposition from
liberal majorities
·
Opposition at home spurred the search for
success abroad
o Question
of Schleswig-Holstein, provinces that belonged to Demark but were part of the
German Confed, was a welcome opportunity
o 1864
when S-H tried to consolidate against German Confed, Prussia joined Austria n a
short and successful war against Denmark
·
Bismarck was convinced that Prussia had to
control completely the northern, predominately Prot part of the German Confed,
which meant expelling Austria from German affairs
·
After victory over Denmark, Bismarck’s skillful
maneuvering would have to be a localized one that would not provoke a mighty
alliance against Prussia
·
By neutralizing France and Russia, he was in a
position to engage in a war of his own making
·
Austro-Prussian
War of 1866 lasted 7 weeks
o Using
RRs and mass troops and new needle gun, the reorganized Prussian army proved
itself
o Overran
n. Germany and defeated Austria at Battle of Sadowa
·
Anticipating future Prussian needs, Bismarck
offered Austria realistic, even generous peace terms
o Austria
paid no reparation and lost no territory, though Venetia was ceded to Italy
·
Existing German Confederation was dissolved, and
Austria agreed to withdraw from German affairs
·
Prussia conquered and annexed several small
states north of the Main River and dominated the remaining principalities of
the newly formed North German Confederation
·
The mainly Catholic states of the south remained
independent while forming alliances with Prussia
·
Bismarck’s fundamental goal of Prussian
expansion was being realized
The Taming of the Parliament
·
Bismarck had long been convinced that the old
order he defended should have peace with the liberal middle class and the
nationalist movement
·
Realized that nationalism was not necessarily
hostile to conservative, authoritarian gov
·
Believed that because of the events of 1848,
German middle class could be led to prefer a national unity under conservative
leadership rather than a long, uncertain battle for truly liberal institutions
·
During
attack on Austria in 1866, he identified Prussia’s fate with the national
development of Germany
·
In the aftermath of victory, Bismarck fashioned
a federal constitution for the new North German Confed: Each state retained its
own local gov, but the king of Prussia became president of the confederation,
and the chancellor, Bismarck, was responsible only to the president
·
The federal gov controlled the army and foreign
affairs
·
There was also a legislature with members of the
lower house elected by universal, single class male suffrage
·
With this radical innovation, Bismarck opened
the door to popular participation and the possibility of going over the head of
the middle class directly to the ppl, much as NAPIII had done
·
Ultimate power rested in the hands of the
dominant state of Prussia and its king and army
·
Bismarck held out an olive branch to PLMT opposition
o Asked
PLMT to pass a special indemnity bill to approve after the fact all the gov’s
spending
o Most
liberally jumped at the chance to cooperate
o With
German unity in sight, they repented their “sins”
·
Constitutional struggle in Prussia was over, and
German middle class was accepting respectfully the monarchial authority and the
aristocratic superiority that Bismarck represented
·
Values of aristocratic Prussian army officers
replaced middle class liberal in esteem and set the social standard
The Franco-Prussian War
·
Final act of German unification
·
Bismarck realized that a patriotic war wit
France would drive south German states into his arms
·
The issue of whether William I’s relative would
become king of Spain was a pretext
·
Goaded by Bismarck and alarmed by their new
neighbor on the Rhine, France decided to teach Prussia a lesson
·
As soon as war began in 1870, Bismarck had the
wholehearted support of the south German states
·
With other gov’s maintaining their neutrality,
Bismarck’s neutrality aid off: German forces under Prussian leadership
decisively defeated the main French army at Sedan
·
Louis NAP was captured and humiliated
·
French patriots in Paris proclaimed another
French republic and vowed to continue fighting
·
Starving Paris surrendered, France accepted
Bismarck’s harsh peace terms
·
S. German state had agreed to join a new German Empire
·
Victorious William I was proclaimed emperor of
Germany in Versailles
·
King of Prussia and his ministers had ultimate
power in the new German Empire and the lower house of the legislature was
elected by universal male suffrage
·
Bismarck and the German Empire imposed a severe
penalty on France
o Indemnity
of 5 billion francs
o Cede
Alsace and Lorraine
·
French men and women of all classes viewed the
seizure of Alsace and Lorraine as a terrible crime; could never forget nor
forgive; relations between France and Germany after 1871 were tragically
poisoned
·
Franco-Prussian War released an enormous surge
of patriotic feeling in Germany
·
Bismarck’s genius, the invincible Prussian army,
the solidarity of king and ppl in a unified nation were trumpeted endlessly
during and after the war
·
The weakest of the greatest powers in 1862,
Prussia had become, in less than a decade, the most powerful state in ERP
·
Most Germans were enormously proud, seeing
themselves as the fittest and best ERPNs
·
Semi-authoritarian nationalism and a “new
conservatism” based on an alliance of propertied classes and support of working
classes, triumphed in Germany
The Modernization of Russia and the Ottoman Empire
·
Russian and Ottoman Empires experienced profound
political crises in mid 19th c
·
Either Russia nor Ottoman Empire aspired to
build a single powerful state out of a jumble of principalities
·
Aspired to build a single powerful state out of
a jumble of principalities
·
Vast multinational states built on long
traditions of military conquest and absolutist rule by elites by dominant
ethnic groups – Russians and Ottoman Turks
·
Early 19th c, governing elites were
strongly opposed to rep govs and national self determination, and continued to
concentrate on absolutist rule and competition with other Great powers
·
Relentless power led to great troubles
·
It became clear that leaders of both empires had
to modernize: the changes that enable a country to compete effectively with the
leading countries at a given time
The “Great Reforms” of Russia
·
1850s: Russia was a poor agrarian society with a
rapidly growing population
Industry was little developed, 90% of population lived off land
Industry was little developed, 90% of population lived off land
·
Peasant serf was basically a slave, and serfdom
was the great moral and political issue of the 1840s
·
Crimean War of 1853056 brought crises
o Fighting
was concentrated in Crimean peninsular on Black sea, Russia’s weak
transportation network of rivers and wagons failed to supply the distant
Russian armies adequately
·
France, GB, Sardinia, and Ottoman Empire
inflicted a humiliating defeat on Russia
o Demonstrated
that Russia had fallen behind the rapidly industrializing nations of western
ERP in many ways
o At
least Russia needed RRs, armaments, and reorganization of the army to maintain
an international position
·
Disastrous war caused hardship and raised the specter
of massive peasant rebellion
·
Reform of serfdom was imperative
·
Military defeat forced Tsar Alexander II and his ministers along the path to rapid social
change and general modernization
·
Freeing of serfs in 1861
o Human
bondage abolished forever
o Freed
serfs received half of the land
o Had
to pay high prices for land and peach peasant village was jointly responsible
for payments of all families in village
o Collective
ownership and responsibility made it very difficult for individual peasants to
improve agricultural methods or leave their villages
o Old
patterns of behavior predominated, and the effects of reform were limited
·
Most of later reforms were halfway measures
o 1864:
go established new institution of local gov, the zemstvo
o Members
of this local assembly were elected
o Zemstvo
executive council dealt with local problems
o Russian
liberals hoped this reform would lead to an elected national PLMT, but they
were disappointed
o Local
zemstvo remained subordinate to traditional bureaucracy and local nobility
·
Reform of legal system
o Indep
courts and equality before the law
·
Education and policies towards Russian Jews were
relaxed
·
Until 20th c, Russia’s greatest strides
toward modernization were economic
o Transportation
and industry were transformed in 2 industrial surges
o After
1860: govs encouraged and subsidized private RR companies
§
Enabled agricultural Russia to export grain and
earn money for economic development
§
Industrial suburbs grew and a modern factory
class grew
·
Strengthened by industrial development, Russia’s
military forces began seizing territory to the south an east, greatly exciting
ardent Russian nationalists and superpatriots, who enthusiastically supported
the gov
·
Industrial dev and the growing prol class aided
to spread of Marxian thought and the transformation of the Russian
revolutionary movement after 1911
·
1881: Alexander II assassinated
·
Era of reform ended
·
Alexander
III was a determined reactionary
o Economic
modernization sped forward again
o Massive
industrialization surge from 1890-1900
·
Key leader was Sergei Witte: tough, competent minister of finance
o Inspired
by writings of Freidrich List, believed that the industrial backwardness was
threatening Russia’s power and greatness
o Gov
built state owned RRs, doubling the network
o Established
high protective tariffs to build Russian industry and put the country on the
gold standard of the “civilized world” to strengthen Russia’s finances
o Used
Westerners to catch up with the West
§
Encouraged foreigners to build factories in
Russia, believing that the inflow of foreign capital was the only way to supply
Russia with abundant and cheap products
§
Westerners located their factories in Russia
§
Foreign capitalists and their engineers built an
enormous and modern steel and coal industry
·
Russia was industrializing and catching up with
the advanced nations of the West
The Russian Revolution of 1905
·
Catching up meant vigorous territorial expansion
o By
1903 Russia had established a sphere of influence in Chinese Manchuria and was
eyeing Korea
o When
diplomatic protests of equally imperialistic Japan were ignored, Japan launched
a surprise attack in February 1904
o Japan
scored repeated victories, Russia was force in Sept 1905 to accept a
humiliating defeat
·
Military disaster abroad brought political
upheaval at home
o Business
and professional classes had long wanted a liberal, rep gov
o Urban
factory workers had grievances together in a labor movement
o Peasants
gained little from reforms and were suffering from poverty and overpopulation
o Nationalist
sentiment was emerging among the empire’s minorities, and subject nationalities,
such as Poles, Ukranians, Latvians, were calling for sef rule
o With
army in Manchuria, all these currents of discontent converged in the revolution
of 1905
·
January 1905: massive crowd of workers and their
families converged peacefully on the Winter Palace in St. Petersburg to present
a petition to the tsar
o Troops
opened fire, killing/wounding hundreds
o Bloody
Sunday massacre turned ordinary workers against the tsar and produced a wave of
general indignation
·
Outlawed political parties came out into the
open, and by 1905 summer, strikes, peasant uprisings, revolts among minority
nationalities and troop mutinies were sweeping the country
·
October 1905: revolutionary surge culminated in
a strike that forced gov to capitulate
·
Tsar issued October Manifesto: granted full
civil rights and promised a popularly elected Duma with real legislative power
o Split
the opposition
§
Middle class leaders helped gov repress uprising
and survive as a constitutional monarchy
·
Before opening the Duma, the gov issued a new
constitution, the Fundamental Laws
o Tsar
retained great powers
o The
Duma, elected indirectly by UMS and a largely appointive upper house could
debate and pass laws, but the tsar had an absolute veto
o The
tsar appointed his ministers who did not need to command a majority in the Duma
·
Disappointed middle class liberals, the largest
class in the Duma saw the Fundamental Laws as a step backward
·
Efforts to cooperate with the tsar’s ministers
soon broke down and after months of deadlock, the tsar dismissed the Duma
·
He and his advisers unilaterally rewrote the
electoral law so as to increase the weight of the propertied classes
·
When elections were held, the tsar could count
on a loyal majority in the Duma
·
His ministers pushed agrarian reforms to break
down collective village ownership and encourage more enterprising peasants
·
In 1914, Russia was a partially modernized,
conservative constitutional monarchy with a peasant based but industrializing
economy
Decline and reform in the Ottoman Empire
·
High point was under Suleiman the Magnificent in
16th c
·
By 18th c it was falling behind
western ERP in science, industrial skill, and military tech
·
Russia’s westernized army was able to occupy Ottoman
provinces on the Danube
·
Ottomans forced to grant Serbia local autonomy
·
1830: Greeks won indep
·
French under Charles X took Algeria
·
Rise of Muhammad
Ali, Ottoman governor in Egypt
o Occupied
Ottoman provinces of Syria and Iraq and appeared ready to depose the Ottoman
sultan Mahmud II
·
Sultan survived because ERPN powers forced
Muhammad Ali to withdraw
o ERPN
powers, minus France, preferred a weak and dependent Ottoman state to a strong
and revitalized Muslim entity under Muhammad Ali
·
Realizing their position, liberal Ottoman
statesman launched in 1839 an era of radical reforms, which lasted till 1876
o Culminated
in a constitution and short lived PLMT
o Tanzimat:
reforms designed to remake the empire on a w. ERPN model
o High
point of reform in Imperial Rescript of 1857
§
Equality before law, modern administration and
military, religious freedom for Muslims, Christians, and Jews
§
New commercial laws allowed free importation of
foreign goods
§
Embraced western educated and accepted secular
values to some extent
·
Intended to bring revolutionary modernization,
the Tanzimat permitted partial recovery but fell short of its goals
o Liberal
reforms failed to halt growth of nationalism among Christian subjects, which
resulted in crises and defeats that undermined all reform efforts
o Ottoman
initiatives did not curtail the appetite of Western imperialism, which secured
a stranglehold on Ottoman economy
o Equality
before law for all citizens and religious communities increased religious disputes,
which were exacerbated by interference of ERPN power
§
Embittered relations between religious
communities, distracted gov from reform mission, split Muslims into secularists
and religious conservatives
§
Many conservative Muslims detested the religious
reforms which they viewed as an impious departure from Islamic tradition and
holy law
§
Became the most dependable support of Sultan who
abandoned model of ERPN liberalism in his long reign
·
Combination of declining international power and
conservative tyranny led to a powerful resurgence of the modernizing impulse
among idealistic Turkish exiles in ERP and young army officers in Istanbul
·
These fervent patriots, Young Turks, seized power
in the rev of 1908 and forced sultan to implement reforms
·
Failed to stop rising tide of anti-Ottoman nationalism
in Balkans, Young Turks helped prepare way for birth of modern secular Turkey
after Ottoman defeat in WWI
The Responsive, National State, 1871-1914
·
For central and w. ERP, the unification of Italy
and Germany by “blood and iron” marked the end of a dramatic period of nation
building
·
After 1871 the heartland of ERP was organized
into strong, national states
·
Only on the borders of ERP, Ireland, Russia,
Austria-Hungary, Ottoman Empire, did subject ppl strive for national
unity/polit indep
General Trends
·
Domestic policies after 1871 had a common
framework
o Firmly
established national
o Mass
politics
o Growing
mass loyalty toward the national state
·
Ordinary ppl felt increasing loyalty to their
govs
o More
ppl could vote
o By
1914 UMS was the rule
o Lots
of psychological and political significance
§
Ordinary men felt they counted and could
influence the gov in some way
§
They were “part of the system”
o Women’s
suffrage movement made some gains
§
1914 Norway gave vote to most women
§
Elsewhere, like in GB, heckled politicians and
held public demonstrations
§
Generally failed before 1914 but paved the way
for triumph after WWI
·
As right to vote spread, politicians and parties
in national PLMTS represented the ppl more responsively
o Multiparty
system prevailed meaning that the PLMTy majorities were built on shifting
coalitions of diff parties, and this gave individual parties leverage to obtain
benefits for their supporters
o Govs
passed laws to alleviate genera problems, gaining greater legitimacy and
appearing more worthy of support
·
Less positive side to building popular support
for strong nation states after 1871
o Govs found they could manipulate national
feeling to create a sense of unity and to divert attention away from underlying
class conflicts
o Conservative
and moderate leaders found that workers who voted socialist would rally around
the flat in a diplomatic crisis or cheer when territory was seized in
Africa/Asia
§
Govs used antiliberal and militaristic policies
to help manage domestic conflicts, at the expense of increasing international
tensions
·
Some fanatics and demagogic polit leaders sought
to build extreme nationalist movements by whipping up popular animosity toward
imaginary enemies, especially the Jews
o Growth
of anti-Semitism
The German Empire
·
New German Empire was a federal union of Prussia
and 24 smaller states
·
Much of everyday business of gov was conducted
by separate states, but there was a strong national gov with a chancellor and a
popularly elected lower house called the Reichstag
·
Bismarck refused to be bound by a PLMT majority, but he tried to
maintain one
o Gave
polit parties opportunities
o Bismarck
relied on National Liberals who rallied to him after 1866 (olive branch)
o They
supported legislation useful for further economic and legal unification of the
country
·
They also backed Bismarck’s attack on the
Catholic Church
o Kulturkampf:
“struggle for civilization”
o Middle
class National Liberals were alarmed by Pius IX
o Seemed
to ask German Catholics to put loyalty to their church above their nation
o Kulturkampf
generally aimed at making the Catholic Church subject to gov control
o But
only in Prot Prussia did this have even limited success, because Caths
throughout the country generally voted for the Center Party, which blocked
passage of national laws hostile to the church
·
1878: Bismarck abandoned his attack on the
church and courted the Catholic Center Party (Catholic small farmers)
o Enacting
high tariffs on cheap grain, won over Catholic Center and Prot Junkers
o With
tariffs, Bismarck won Catholic and conservative support
·
Many other gov’s followed Bismarck’s lead
o 1880-90s:
widespread return to protectionism in ERP
o France:
high tariffs to protect agriculture, industry, peasants, and manufacturers from
foreign competition
o ERPN
govs were responding effectively to a major economic problem and winning
greater loyalty
o Rise
of protectionism was an example of the dangers of self centered nationalism:
new tariffs led to international name calling and wars
·
BMK tried to stop Socialism’s growth in Germany
cuz he feared its revolutionary language and allegiance to a movement
transcending the nation state
o Orchestrated
a national outcry to ram through the Reichstag a law that controlled socialist
meetings and publications and outlawed the Social Democratic Party, which was
driven underground
o German
socialists continued to hold influence, and BMK tried again
·
To win the support of the working class, BMK
urged the Reichstag to take action and enact state supported social measures
o Big
businesses and conservatives accused BMK of creating “State socialism” but BMK
pressed his program through speeches
·
BMK and his supporters carried the day and his
essentially conservative nation state pioneered in the provision of social
welfare programs
o Help
wage earners, national sickness/accident insurance, old age pensions and
retirement benefits
o Sick,
injured, retired workers could look forward to some regular benefits from the
state
o National
social security system, paid for through compulsory wage contributions by wage
earners and grants from the state was the first of its kind
·
BMK’s social security system did not stop
workers from voting socialist, but it did give them a small stake in the system
and protect them from some uncertainties
·
Enormously significant development was a product
of polit competition and gov efforts to win popular support
·
Great issues in German domestic politics were
socialism and the Marxian Social Democratic Party
o New
emperor, William II opposed BMK’s
attempt to renew the law outlawing Social Democratic Party
o Eager
to rule in his own right and earn support of workers, William II forced BMK to
resign
o German
foreign policy changed profoundly and most for the worst
·
William was no more successful than BMK in
getting workers to renounce socialism
o Social
Democrats won more and more seats in the Reichstag
o Became
German’s largest single party in 1912
o Shocked
aristocrats and their conservative middle class allies, heightening fears of a
socialist upheaval
o “Revolutionary
socialists” broadened its base by adopting a more patriotic tone, allowing for
greater military spending and imperialistic expansion
o German
socialist concentrated on gradual social and political reform
Republican France
·
War w/ Prussia undid efforts to reduce class
antagonisms
·
In 1871 France seemed hopelessly divided once
again
·
Patriotic republicans who proclaimed the Third
Republic in Paris after Sedan refused to admit defeat
·
Were starved into submission in 1871
·
National elections sent a large majority of
conservatives and monarchs to National Assembly, France’s leaders decided they
had no choice but to surrender Alsace and Lorraine
·
Traumatized Parisians exploded and proclaimed
Paris Commune in March 1871
·
Vaguely radical, leaders of Commune wanted to
govern Paris without interference from the conservative French countryside
·
National Assembly, led by Adolphe Theirs would hear none of it
o Assembly
ordered French Army into Paris and crushed Commune
o French
against French
·
French slowly formed a new national unity,
getting considerable stability before 1914
o Luck:
Monarchists in the “republican” national assembly could not agree on who should
be king. The compromise Bourbon candidate wanted absolute power, unacceptable
to supporters of moderate, constitutional monarchy
o Their’s
destruction of the Commune showed the fearful provinces and middle class that
the 3rd Repub might be moderate and socially conservative
·
France retained the republic, though reluctantly
o “The
government which divides us least”
·
Skill and determination of the moderate repub leader
sin the year years
o Leon Gambetta
·
Moderate repubs sought to preserve their
creation by winning the hearts and minds of the next generation
o Trade
unions legalized
o France
acquired a colonial empire
o Series
of laws between 1879-1886 established free compulsory elementary education for
both girls and boys
o Expanded
state system of public tax supported schools
·
In France and throughout the Western world, the
general expansion of public education served as a critical nation building tool
in the late 19th c
o In
France most elementary and much secondary education had traditionally been in
the hands of the Cath, who were hostile to repubs and much of secular life
o Free
compulsory elementary education in France became secular republican education
·
Though the educations reforms of the 1880s
disturbed French Caths, many rallied to the republic in 1890
o Limited
acceptance by more liberal Pope Leo XIII
eased tensions between church and state
·
Dreyfus affair changed all that
o Alfred Dreyfus: Jewish captain in
French army, falsely convicted of treason
o Dreyfus
gained support of Emile Zola and republicans
o Case
split France apart
§
Army with anti-Semites and Catholic establishment
vs libertarians and most of the more radical republicans
·
Dreyfus declared innocent, but revived
republican feeling against the church
o Gov
severed all ties with Cath Church from 1901-1905
o Salaries
of priests and bishops were no longer paid by gov and all churches were given
to local committees of lay Caths
o Cath
schools were put on their own financially and lost 1/3 of their students
o State
school system’s power of indoctrination was greatly strengthened
·
Only the growing socialist movement stood in
opposition to patriotic, republican nationalism
Great Britain and Ireland
·
Brit in late 19th c was not a
peaceful transition that the 2 party PLMT went from classical liberalism to
democracy
·
Right to vote was granted to males of the solid
middle class in 1832
·
Benjamin
Disraeli: Extended vote to middle class males and best paid workers to
broaden the Conservative Party’s traditional base of aristocratic and landed
support
·
The “lower orders” seemed to be able to vote as
responsible as their “betters”
·
Third Reform Bill of 1884 gave the vote to
almost ever adult male
·
House of commons was drifting toward democracy
·
The House of lords tried to reassert itself in
1901-1910
o Acting
as supreme court of the land, it ruled against labor unions
o In
1906 After liberal party came to power, the Lords vetoed several measures
passed by the Commons, including the People’s Budget, designed to increasing spending
on social welfare services
o Lords
capitulated when the king threatened to create enough new peers to pass the
bill, and aristocratic conservatism yielded to popular democracy once and for
all
·
The extensive social welfare, slow to come to GB
were passed in a rush between 1906 and 1914
o During
these years, the Liberal party, inspired by Welshman David Lloyd George raised taxes on the rich as part of the
People’s Budget
o This
income helped gov pay for national health insurance, unemployment benefits, old
age pensions, and other social measures
o The
state was integrating the urban masses socially as well as politically
·
Eve of WWI, question of Ireland brought GB to
brink of civil war
·
After famine, English slowly brought concessions
·
William
Gladstone: wanted to pacify Ireland, passed bills to give Ireland self gov
o Failed
to pass, but In 1913 Irish nationalists in the Brit PLMT gained a home rule
bill for Ireland
·
Ireland was on the brink of self gov
·
Ireland composed of 2 ppl
o Irish
Catholic in south wanted home rule
o Prots
in Ulster (the north) didn’t
§
Refused to submerge themselves in Cath Ireland
·
Ulsterites vowed to resist home rule in northern
Ireland
o Army
volunteers
o Supported
by much of English public opinion
·
1914: Liberals in House of Lords introduced a
bill that gave south home rule
o Betrayed
promises made to Irish nationalists, was rejected
·
September: original home rule bill was passed
but suspended by WWI
·
Irish developments illustrated the power of
national feeling and national movements in the 19th c
·
Proof
that gov’s couldn’t elicit greater loyalty unless they could capture and control
the elemental current of national feeling
·
GB had lots going for it but none of this
availed in the face of the conflicting nationalisms created by Caths and Prots
in n Ireland
·
Similar to Ottomans
The Austro-Hungarian Empire
·
1849: Magyar nationalism had driven Hungarian
patriots to declare an indep Hungarian republic, which was savagely crushed by
Russian and Austrian armies
·
1850s: Hungary was ruled as a conquered
territory while Emp. Francis Joseph and his bureaucracy tried to centralize the
state and Germanize the language and culture of the diff nationalities
·
Weakened Austria was forced to strike a
compromise and establish a dual monarchy
·
Empire divided into two and nationalistic
Magyars gained virtual indep for Hungary
·
Two states were only joined by a shared monarch
and common ministries for finance, defense, and foreign affairs
·
In Austria and ethnic Germans were only 1/3 of
the population, and in 1895 Germans saw their traditional dominance threatened
by Czechs, Poles, and Slavs
o Wanted
their language in gov and education
·
PLMT was so divided that they used decree rather
than majority
·
Efforts by conservatives and socialists to
defuse national antagonisms by stressing economic issues that cut across ethnic
lines was unsuccessful
·
Magyar nobility resorted constitution of 1848
and used it to dominate both peasantry and minority populations
o Wealthiest
¼ of adults had right to vote
o PLMT
was creature of Magyar elite
·
Laws promoted Magyar language in schools and
gov, and were resented by minority populations
·
Magyar extremists campaigned for separation from
Austria, radical leaders of subject nationalities dreamed for indep from Hungary
·
Unlike
most major countries that harnessed nationalism to strengthen the state after
1871, the Austro-Hungarian Empire was progressively weakened and destroyed by
it
Jewish Emancipation and Anti-Semitism
·
Changes in Jewish Life in western and central
ERP
·
1848: Jews formed regiment for Germany and
Austria; Frankfurt Assembly endorsed full rights for German Jews
·
Abolished restrictions of Jewish marriage,
choice of occupation etc
·
Exclusion from gov and discrimination socially
remained
·
Widely accepted that disappearance of anti
Jewish prejudice was inevitable
·
Jews thrived in new opportunities and were
successful
·
By 1871 a majority had improved their economic
situation and entered middle class
·
Most Jewish pl ID’d with their nation states and
saw themselves as patriotic citizens
·
Vicious anti-Semitism reappeared after the stock
market crash of 1873 in c ERP
o Drawing
on long traditions, this anti-Semitism was also a modern development, building
on the reaction against liberalism
o Whipped
up resentment against Jewish achievement and Jewish financial control while
fanatics claimed the Jewish race was a biological threat to the German ppl
o Anti
Semites: conservatives, extreme nationalists, business ppl threatened by Jews
·
Anti-Semites created modern political parties to
attack and degrade Jews
o Karl Leuger: “Christian Socialists”
§
Mayor of Vienna
§
Combined fierce anti-Semitic rhetoric with
municipal ownership of basic services
§
Appealed to German speaking lower middle class
·
Theodore
Herzl: Created Zionism and the creation of a Jewish state
·
Anti-Semitism was most oppressive in e. ERP
where Jews suffered from poverty
·
Russia: officials used anti-Semitism to channel
popular discontent away from the gov and onto the Jewish minority; Jews seen as
foreign exploiters who corrupted national traditions
o Violent
pogroms
o Police
stood by as peasants looted and destroyed Jewish property
o Some
Jews turned towards Zionsts and a settlement in Palestine
o Lots
immigrated
Marxism and the Socialist Movement
·
Nationalism was the new unifying principle
·
Socialism grew rapidly in these years; dedicated
to an international proletarian revolution
·
Prosperous/conservative citizens were troubled
by socialist movement
·
Conflict between revolutionary socialism vs
nationalist alliance and the conservative aristocracy an prosperous middle
class
The Socialist International
·
Growth of socialist parties after 1871 was
phenomenal
o BMK
couldn’t check the growth of the German Social Democratic Party
o By
1912 it had millions of followers mostly from the working class and was the largest
party in the Reichstag
·
Socialist parties also grew in other countries
but not with as much success
·
Russian exiles founded Social Democratic Party;
French; Belgium; Austria-Hungary
·
Marxian socialist parties were linked together
in an international organization
o Marx
believed “working men have no country” and urged proles of all countries to
unite
·
International working Men’s Association
o Annual
meetings spread his realistic, “scientific” doctrines of inevitable socialist
revolution
o Embrace
radical Paris Commune as step toward socialist revolution, which frightened
early supporters (Brit labor leaders)
o First
International collapsed
·
International Prol solidarity remained an
important objective for Marxists
o Socialist
leaders came together to form the Second International, which lasted until 1914
o Federation
of national socialist parties, but had great psychological impact
o Delegates
from diff parties met to interpret Marxian doctrines and plan coordinated
action
o May
1 was annual one day strike day of marches and demonstrations
o Permanent
executive for the International was established
o Many
feared the rejoiced in power of socialism in the Second International
Unions and Revisionism
·
Was socialism radical and revolutionary? NO
·
Looked toward gradual change and steady
improvement for the working class and less towards revolution
·
Became militantly moderate: combined radical
rhetoric with sober action
·
Workers were less inclined to follow radical
programs
o Workers
gained right to vote and participate politically, so they focused their
attention more on elections than on revolutions
o As
workers won real, tangible benefits, this furthered the process
o Responded
positively to parades and loyally voted for socialists (more nationalist)
o Workers
were not a unified social group
o Standard
of living rose gradually but substantially
·
More militantly moderate: demanded gains, but
were less likely to take to the barricades in pursuit of them
·
Growth of labor unions reinforced this trend
o Modern
unions were generally prohibited by law
o Other
countries had similar laws
o Unions
considered subversive bodies to be hounded and crushed
o GB
led way in 1824-25 when unions won right to exist but not the right to strike
§
New, more practical unions appeared
§
Highly skilled workers
§
New “model unions” concentrated on wining better
wages and hours through collective bargaining and compromise
§
Paved way to full acceptance and unions for
unskilled workers
o Germany:
anti-socialist laws removed in 1890, unions granted rights in 1869, harassed by
gov; almost all legal harassment eliminated, union membership skyrocketed
·
Changing character of German unions
o Focused
on bread and butter issues: wages, hours, working conditions, rather than the dissemination
of socialist doctrine
o Collective
bargaining recognized by German Trade Union Congress in 1899
o Strikes
made resolute employers change their minds
·
German trade unions and their leaders were
thoroughgoing revisionists
o Revionism:
most awful of sins in the eyes of militant Marxists, effort to update Marxian
doctrines to reflect realities of the time
o Eduard Bernstein: Socialists should
reform their doctrines and tactics and should combine with other progressive
forces to win continued evolutionary gains for workers through legislation,
unions, and further economic development
o Denounced
as heresy by the German Social Democratic Party and the entire Social International
·
Revisionist approach continued to gain acceptance
of many German socialists, particularly in trade unions
·
France: Jean
Jaures repudiated revisionist doctrines to make a unified socialist party
·
Split Russian Marxists
·
Socialist 1914: Russians and Austria-Hungarians
MOST RADICAL; Germans with trade unions practice reformism and talked
revolution; French talked revolution unrestrained by trade union weak and
radical; England: Socialist, non Marxian Labour Party gradual reform: Spain and
Italy: Anarchy dominated
·
Socialist policies and doctrines varied from
country to country
·
Socialism was “nationalized” behind the imposing
façade of international unity
No comments:
Post a Comment